Journal Tier List offers a new user-driven platform for ranking and review academic
journals.
Unlike impact measures based on citations, our rankings reflect real user reviews and experiences.
Methods publishes original review and research articles that cover emerging methodology in many areas of life and health sciences. The research areas covered by Methods include, but are not limited to,
• Biochemistry and biophysics
• Cell, molecular, and developmental biology and genetics
• Computational biology and bioinformatics
• Medicinal chemistry, biological chemistry, and biophysical chemistry
• Microbiology, immunology, and virology
• Physiology and pathology
• Bioengineering, b...Methods publishes original review and research articles that cover emerging methodology in many areas of life and health sciences. The research areas covered by Methods include, but are not limited to,
• Biochemistry and biophysics
• Cell, molecular, and developmental biology and genetics
• Computational biology and bioinformatics
• Medicinal chemistry, biological chemistry, and biophysical chemistry
• Microbiology, immunology, and virology
• Physiology and pathology
• Bioengineering, biomedical engineering, and biochemical engineering
• Biomaterials, natural products, and materials science
• Therapeutics and diagnostics, biosensors, and devices
Mid quality overall. You can definitely see that some papers get published without much scrutiny. Stats and null result reporting is abysmal especially in social sciences.
I recently published a paper in eLife, and while the peer review process was rigorous and fair, the turnaround time was quite long. It took over six months from submission to publication, which is frustrating for researchers needing timely dissemination of their work. The new publishing model, which emphasizes transparency and includes publishing reviewer comments and decision letters, is a positive step. However, the long wait times detract from the overall experience. Despite this, the journal...I recently published a paper in eLife, and while the peer review process was rigorous and fair, the turnaround time was quite long. It took over six months from submission to publication, which is frustrating for researchers needing timely dissemination of their work. The new publishing model, which emphasizes transparency and includes publishing reviewer comments and decision letters, is a positive step. However, the long wait times detract from the overall experience. Despite this, the journal's commitment to open science and high-quality peer review makes it a reputable platform for scientific publications.